Soyinka hits Tinubu, says president’ speech bland, didn’t address brutality on protesters
Nobel laureate Professor Wole Soyinka has criticized President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s nationwide address, asserting that it failed to address the brutal crackdown on #EndBadGovernance protesters by security agencies.
In a statement released on Sunday, Soyinka highlighted the shortcomings of the President’s response to the protests, which have seen Nigerians take to the streets across major cities to decry the high cost of living, hardship, hunger, and poverty, all blamed on recent government policies like the removal of fuel subsidy and the floating of the naira.
Related news
Sen Girei calls for calm as nationwide protest enters day one
Nationwide protest: Parallel processions as Tinubu supporters take over Yola
Nationwide protest organizers parley IGP, reject confined protest option
Over the past four days, the protests have turned violent in some states, resulting in several deaths. Concerned by the escalating situation, President Tinubu delivered his first nationwide speech since the demonstrations began, calling for calm and reiterating that the subsidy removal would not be reversed.
However, Soyinka was particularly critical of the President’s outlined remedial actions and the government’s handling of the protests.
“His outline of the government’s remedial action since inception, aimed at warding off just such an outbreak, will undoubtedly receive expert and sustained attention both for effectiveness and in content analysis. My primary concern, quite predictably, is the continuing deterioration of the state’s seizure of protest management, an area in which the presidential address fell conspicuously short,” Soyinka stated.
Soyinka argued that Nigeria’s security agencies are aware of more civilized methods of handling protests but have chosen to ignore them.
“Such short-changing of civic deserving, regrettably, goes to arm the security forces in the exercise of impunity and condemns the nation to a seemingly unbreakable cycle of resentment and reprisals,” he noted.
He condemned the use of live bullets as a state response to civic protests, labeling it the core issue.
“Live bullets as a state response to civic protest – that becomes the core issue. Even tear gas remains questionable in most circumstances, certainly an abuse in situations of clearly peaceful protest. Hunger marches constitute a universal S.O.S., not peculiar to the Nigerian nation. They belong indeed in a class of their own, never mind the collateral claims emblazoned on posters,” Soyinka added.
Soyinka emphasized that hunger marches are a desperate call for governance intervention, indicating that a breaking point has been reached.
“They serve as summons to governance that a breaking point has been reached and thus, a testing ground for governance awareness of public desperation. The tragic response to the ongoing hunger marches in parts of the nation, and for which notice was served, constitutes a retrogression that takes the nation even further back than the deadly culmination of the watershed ENDSARS protests,” he said.
Referencing historical context, Soyinka compared the current government’s actions to colonial-era repression.
“It evokes pre-independence – that is, colonial – acts of disdain, a passage that induced the late stage pioneer Hubert Ogunde’s folk opera BREAD AND BULLETS, earning that nationalist serial persecution and proscription by the colonial government,” he concluded.
Soyinka’s statement underscores the deepening discontent with the government’s approach to managing the protests, highlighting a need for more humane and effective methods of addressing the grievances of the Nigerian people.
Read the statement in full below:
The HUNGER MARCH As UNIVERSAL MANDATE
I set my alarm clock for this morning to ensure that I did not miss President Bola Tinubu’s impatiently awaited address to the nation on the current unrest across the nation. His outline of government’s remedial action since inception, aimed at warding off just such an outbreak, will undoubtedly receive expert and sustained attention both for effectiveness and in content analysis. My primary concern, quite predictably, is the continuing deterioration of the state’s seizure of protest management, an area in which the presidential address fell conspicuously short. Such short-changing of civic deserving, regrettably, goes to arm the security forces in the exercise of impunity and condemns the nation to a seemingly unbreakable cycle of resentment and reprisals.
Live bullets as state response to civic protest – that becomes the core issue. Even tear gas remains questionable in most circumstances, certainly an abuse in situations of clearly peaceful protest. Hunger marches constitute a universal S.O.S, not peculiar to the Nigerian nation. They belong indeed in a class of their own, never mind the collateral claims emblazoned on posters. They serve as summons to governance that a breaking point has been reached and thus, a testing ground for governance awareness of public desperation. The tragic response to the ongoing hunger marches in parts of the nation, and for which notice was served, constitutes a retrogression that takes the nation even further back than the deadly culmination of the watershed ENDSARS protests. It evokes pre-independence – that is, colonial – acts of disdain, a passage that induced the late stage pioneer Hubert Ogunde’s folk opera BREAD AND BULLETS, earning that nationalist serial persecution and proscription by the colonial government.
The nation’s security agencies cannot pretend unawareness of alternative models for emulation, civilized advances in security intervention. Need we recall the nationwide 2022/23 editions of what is generally known as the YELLOW VEST movement in France? Perhaps it is time to make such scenarios compulsory viewing in policing curriculum. In all of the coverage that I watched, I did not catch one single instance of a gun leveled at protesters, much less fired at them even during direct physical confrontations. The serving of bullets where bread is pleaded is ominous retrogression, and we know what that eventually proves – a prelude to far more desperate upheavals, not excluding revolutions.
The time is long overdue, surely, to abandon, permanently, the anachronistic resort to lethal means by the security agencies of governance. No nation is so under-developed, materially impoverished, or simply internally insecure as to lack the will to set an example. All it takes is to recall its own history, then exercise the will to commence a lasting transformation, inserting a break in the chain of lethal responses against civic society. Today’s marchers may wish to consider adopting the key songs of Hubert Ogunde’s BREAD AND BULLETS, if only to inculcate a sense of shame in the continuing failure to transcend the lure of colonial inheritance where we all were at the receiving end. One way or the other, this vicious cycle must be broken.
