Absence of FG’s counsel delays trial of ‘Terrorist Negotiator’ Tukur Mamu

Tukur Mamu
Tukur Mamu

Absence of FG’s counsel delays trial of ‘Terrorist Negotiator’ Tukur Mamu

The trial commencement of Tukur Mamu, who is accused of having ties with terrorists involved in an attack on a Kaduna-bound train last year, was stalled due to the absence of counsel for the Federal Government.

The trial was scheduled before Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja. Mamu’s counsel informed the court that the prosecuting counsel was unavailable due to training, leading to an adjournment of the trial to July 19.

Tukur Mamu, a former negotiator with terrorists, was arraigned on March 21 by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation on ten counts related to terrorism financing, particularly in connection with the recent Abuja-Kaduna train attack.

During the proceedings, Mamu pleaded not guilty to the charges. On April 27, the court denied his bail application, citing his failure to refute the claims made in the counter-affidavit filed by the Department of State Services (DSS), the agency detaining him.

Families of abducted train passengers vow to occupy gov’t buildings in Kaduna, Abuja

Mamu’s arrest occurred on September 6, 2022, when he was en route to Saudi Arabia for Lesser Hajj but was detained at Cairo International Airport and subsequently repatriated to Nigeria.

House of assembly member in Kaduna, Madami dies 3 days after inauguration

The charges against Mamu allege his involvement in aiding and abetting Boko Haram terrorism attacks against innocent Nigeria I’m inclined to the private sector, not eyeing any position in Tinubu’s govt, el-Rufai

He is accused of receiving various amounts of money in different currencies from the families of the victims of the train attack.

The collected funds reportedly amounted to $420,000, along with an additional N21 million from other affected families.

Furthermore, Mamu is accused of concealing these terrorism funds in his residence in Kaduna, which violates the provisions of the Terrorism Prevention, Prohibition Act. However, Mamu has steadfastly denied all the charges brought against him.

ASUU urges ABU to disrobe Nasiru El-Rufai of its degree

The absence of the Federal Government’s counsel, which caused the delay in the trial, raises questions about the progress and handling of the case.

Mamu’s defense lawyer, Obiabo Francis-Amedo, notified the court about the situation and revealed that the prosecution had proposed a date before the vacation period.

Consequently, Justice Ekwo scheduled the trial to resume on July 19. The adjournment being at the prosecution’s request indicates that both sides need ample time to prepare and present their arguments in what is undoubtedly a high-profile case involving terrorism-related charges.

The trial of Tukur Mamu has garnered significant attention due to the gravity of the allegations against him.

As a former negotiator with terrorists, his alleged involvement in aiding and abetting terrorism has raised concerns about the security situation in Nigeria.

The attack on the Kaduna-bound train was a tragic incident that shocked the nation, and the authorities are determined to hold those responsible accountable.

Mamu’s denial of the charges and the court’s refusal to grant him bail based on his health and the DSS’s counter-affidavit have further intensified the legal battle.

The prosecution will have the burden of proving Mamu’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defense will strive to present a compelling case challenging the credibility of the accusations.


We do hope that the information we were able to provide you are helpful. Checkout out other unique articles on our blog for more detailed information and do well to share with your friends and family. Follow us on our Twitter and Facebook to stay updated with premium information.

Please leave any comments or questions in the area given below.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in Fact Check are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Fact Check. Any content provided by our bloggers or authors is of their opinion and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, or anyone or anything.

Information is presented to the best of our knowledge and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability concerning the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Therefore, any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here