Culpable homicide: Man bags 21-year jail term in Adamawa
Adamawa State High Court of Justice sitting in Ganye, on Wednesday, convicted and sentenced a man Nuhu Pius to 21 years imprisonment.
The court presided by Hon. Justice Maxwell T. Pukuma, sentenced the convict after he was tried and found guilty on 1 count charge of “culpable homicide”.
Hon. Justice Pukuma had while delivering a judgement, declared that the sentence will start running from the day of his remand, and that it is without an option of fine.
The Hon. Judge held that the prosecution has proven its case against the 32-year-old Nuhu Pius as provided by law and therefore found him guilty as charged.
The convict, Nuhu was arraigned before the court on the 14th April, 2022 where he pleaded not guilty to the alleged offence.
In a bid to establish its case against the convict, the prosecution called 4 witnesses who testified in court and tendered a confessional statement which was rejected after a trial within trial was conducted.
The convict was arraigned before the court for culpable homicide not punishable with death contrary to section 193(1) of the Penal Code Law 2018 and punishable under the same section.
According to the prosecution, Nuhu had on or about the 7th December, 2019 at a tea joint in Trigali village, in Ganye Local Government Area in the state caused the death of Gabriel Solomon.
The prosecution told the court that the convict had engaged in a fight with Wari, and in the course of it, the deceased who was trying to separate them, hit the convict with a stick on his head.
While deprived of the power of self- control following sudden provocation, the deceased in retaliation did an illegal act to wit by stabbing him with a knife on the chest, which resulted to his death.
Earlier, when asked whether he has an allocutus, the convict who spoke through his counsel, Obidah N. Oliver, pleaded with the court to temper justice with mercy because the convict is a first time offender and has family.
In his reaction shortly after the judgement, Obidah appreciated the court for the judgement, saying that he will have a conference with his client and see whether they will challenge the judgement at the court of appeal.
We do hope that the information we were able to provide you are helpful. Checkout out other unique articles on our blog for more detailed information and do well to share with your friends and family. Follow us on our Twitter and Facebook to stay updated with premium information.
Please leave any comments or questions in the area given below.
DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in Fact Check are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Fact Check. Any content provided by our bloggers or authors is of their opinion and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, or anyone or anything.
Information is presented to the best of our knowledge and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability concerning the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Therefore, any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.